Dem senator: Americans who don’t want KSM tried in civilian court can “go somewhere else”
This ass will go somewhere else in 2010. Can you say goodbye?
Significant constitutional implications of holding a 'terrorist for trial'. The search warrant question here is bait but the underlying point isn’t:
Unless Holder and Obama have a crystal ball, they cannot predict how the judge will rule on evidentiary or constitutional issues.The scary part:
Unless Holder and Obama have a crystal ball, they cannot predict how the judge will rule on evidentiary or constitutional issues. In fact, a former CIA official was sure that the defense attorneys will try to change the focus of the trial from KSM’s atrocities to his confession coerced by the harsh interrogation techniques. He and others interviewed used the phrase “the fruit of the poisonous tree,” referring to the doctrine whereby some evidence may be declared inadmissible. He further declared that “I am worried about a civilian judge because if that confession is thrown out the rest of the evidence will be as well. Will the judge allow this nonsense into the courtroom?”
This is a DEMOCRAT/LIBERAL/SOCIALIST agenda and if these guys walk, there will be some very pissed off Americans.
I just don't think these arrogant Democrat wusses get what is coming down the pike. Their day is done.
